Dual-band Dipole Antenna for 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz RFID Tag Application

Main Article Content

Y. Yu
J. Ni
Z. Xu

Abstract

In this paper, a dual-band dipole antenna for passive radio frequency identification (RFID) tag application at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz is designed and optimized using HFSS 13. The proposed antenna is composed of a bent microstrip patch and a coupled rectangular microstrip patch. The optimal results of this antenna are obtained by sweeping antenna parameters. Its return losses reach to -18.7732 dB and -18.2514 dB at 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz, respectively. The bandwidths (Return loss <=-10 dB) are 2.42~2.50 GHz and 5.77~5.82 GHz. And the relative bandwidths are 3.3% and 0.9%. It shows good impedance, gain, and radiation characteristics for both bands of interest. Besides, the input impedance of the proposed antenna may be tuned flexibly to conjugate-match to that of the IC chip.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yu, Y., Ni, J., & Xu, Z. (2015). Dual-band Dipole Antenna for 2.45 GHz and 5.8 GHz RFID Tag Application. Advanced Electromagnetics, 4(1), 31-35. https://doi.org/10.7716/aem.v4i1.288
Section
Research Articles

References


  1. G. Capraro and C. R. Paul, A probabilistic approach to wire coupling interference prediction, in Proc. EEE Int. Zurich Symp. Electromagn. Compat, Zurich, Switzerland, 1981, pp. 267-272.

  2. C. R. Paul, Sensitivity of crosstalk to variations in cable bundles, in Proc. EEE Int. Zurich Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Zurich, Switzerland, 1987, pp. 617-622.

  3. S. Shiran, B. Reiser, and H. Cory, A probabilistic model for the evaluation of coupling between transmission lines, EEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 387-393, Aug. 1993.
    View Article

  4. A. Ciccolella and F. G. Canavero, Stochastic prediction of wire coupling interference, in Proc. EEE Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Atlanta, GA, Aug. 1995, pp. 51-56.
    View Article

  5. D. Bellan and S. A. Pignari, A prediction model for crosstalk in large and densely-packed random wire bundles, in Proc. nt. Wroclaw Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Wroclaw, Poland, 2000, pp. 267-269.

  6. D. Bellan, S. A. Pignari, and G. Spadacini, Characterisation of crosstalk in terms of mean value and standard deviation, in EE Proc.-Sci. Meas. Technol., vol. 150, no. 6, pp. 289-295, Nov. 2003.
    View Article

  7. F. Diouf and F. G. Canavero, Crosstalk statistics via collocation method, in Proc. EEE Int. Symp. Electromagn. Compat., Austin, TX, Aug. 2009, pp. 92-97.
    View Article

  8. M. Wu, D. G. Beetner, T. H. Hubing, H. Ke, and S. Sun, Statistical prediction of reasonable worst-case crosstalk in cable bundles, EEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 842-851, Aug. 2009.
    View Article

  9. D. Bellan and S. A. Pignari, Efficient estimation of crosstalk statistics in random wire bundles with lacing cords, EEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 209-218, Feb. 2011.
    View Article

  10. D. Bellan and S. A. Pignari, Statistical superposition of crosstalk effects in cable bundles, China Commun., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 119-128, Nov. 2013.
    View Article

  11. S. Lallechere, B. Jannet, P. Bonnet, and F. Paladian, Sensitivity analysis to compute advanced stochastic problems in uncertain and complex electromagnetic environments, Advanced Electromagnetics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 13-23, Oct. 2012.
    View Article

  12. C. Kasmi, M. Helier, M. Darces, and E. Prouff, Design of experiments for factor hierachization in complex structure modelling, Advanced Electromagnetics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59-64, Feb. 2013.
    View Article

  13. I. S. Stievano, P. Manfredi, and F. G. Canavero, Stochastic analysis of multiconductor cables and interconnects, EEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 501-507, May 2011.
    View Article

  14. D. Xiu and G. E. Karniadakis, The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations, SIAM J. Scientific Computing, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 619-644, 2002.
    View Article

  15. P. Manfredi, I .S. Stievano, and F. G. Canavero, Time- and frequency-domain evaluation of stochastic parameters on signal lines, Advanced Electromagnetics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 85-93, Oct. 2012.
    View Article

  16. P. Manfredi and F. G. Canavero, Numerical calculation of polynomial chaos coefficients for stochastic per-unit-length parameters of circular conductors, EEE Trans. Magnetics, vol. 50, no. 3, part 2, article #7026309, Mar. 2014.
    View Article

  17. D. Xiu, Fast numerical methods for stochastic computations: a review, Commun. Computational Physics, vol. 5, no. 2-4, pp. 242-272, Feb. 2009.

  18. J .C. Clements, C. R. Paul, and A. T. Adams, Computation of the capacitance matrix for systems of dielectric-coated cylindrical conductors, EEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. EMC-17, no. 4, pp. 238-248, Nov. 1975.
    View Article

  19. C. R. Paul and A. E. Feather, Computation of the transmission line inductance and capacitance matrices from the generalized capacitance matrix, EEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. EMC-18, no. 4, pp. 175-183, Nov. 1976.
    View Article

  20. S.-K. Chang, T. K. Liu, and F. M. Tesche, Calculation of the per-unit-length capacitance matrix for shielded insulated wires, Technical Report, Science Applications Inc. Berkeley Calif, AD-A048 174/7, Sep. 1977.

  21.  P. Manfredi and F. G. Canavero, Crosstalk in stochastic cables via numerical multiseries expansion, in Proc. EEE Int. Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applicat., Turin, Italy, Sep. 2013, pp. 1527-1530.
    View Article

  22. Z. Zhang, T. A. El-Moselhy, I. M. Elfadel, and L. Daniel, Stochastic testing method for transistor-level uncertainty quantification based on generalized polynomial chaos, EEE Trans. Comput.-Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst., vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1533-1545, Oct. 2013.
    View Article

  23. R. Pulch, Stochastic collocation and stochastic Galerkin methods for linear differential algebraic equations, J. Computational Appl. Math., vol. 262, pp. 281-291, May 2014.
    View Article

  24. C. R. Paul, Analysis of Multiconductor Transmission Lines. New York: Wiley, 1994.

  25. M. Loeve, Probability Theory. 4th edn., New York: Springer-Verlag, 1977.

  26. M. Berveiller, Elements finis stochastiques: approaches intrusive et non intrusive pour des analyses de fiabilite, Ph.D. dissertation, Universit'e Blaise Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France, Oct. 2005.

  27. O. Aiouaz, D. Lautru, M.-F. Wong, E. Conil, A. Gati, J. Wiart, and V. F. Hanna, Uncertainty analysis of the specific absorption rate induced in a phantom using a stochastic spectral collocation method, Ann. Telecommun., vol. 66, no. 7-8, pp. 409-418, Aug. 2011.
    View Article

  28. A. C. M. Austin, N. Sood, J. Siu, and C. D. Sarris, Application of polynomial chaos to quantify uncertainty in deterministic channel models, EEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 5754-5761, Nov. 2013.
    View Article

  29. P. Kersaudy, S. Mostarshedi, B. Sudret, O. Picon, and J. Wiart, Stochastic analysis of scattered field by building facades using polynomial chaos, EEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 6382-6393, Dec. 2014.
    View Article

  30. G. H. Golub, J. H. Welsch, Calculation of Gauss quadrature rules, Math. Comput., pp. 221-230, 1969.
    View Article

  31. J.-S. Roger Jang, Matrix Inverse in Block Form. Online resource: http://www.cs.nthu.edu.tw/~jang/book/addenda/matinv/matinv/, Mar. 2001. E. V. Haynsworth, On the Schur complement, Basel Math. Notes, no. 20, Jun. 1968.